Deposit Market Competition, Costs of Funding and Bank Risk
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper presents an empirical examination of the effects of both deposit market competition and of wholesale funding on bank risk simultaneously. The traditional view of the relation between competition and risk has focused on the disciplining role of the charter value. In this project we argue that if the structure of bank liabilities and the costs of retail and wholesale funding are jointly determined with bank risk, the omission of wholesale funding in the empirical analysis of the relation between deposit market competition and risk may give rise to a substantial bias in the estimated results. This will be especially the case where wholesale lenders “screen” their borrowers’ risk as argued by the market discipline literature. We propose a new approach to the estimation of the relation between deposit market competition and bank risk which accounts for the opportunity of banks to shift to wholesale funding when deposit market competition is intense. The analysis is based on a unique comprehensive dataset which combines retail deposit rates data with data on bank characteristics and with data on local deposit market features for a sample of 589 US banks. Our results support the notion of a risk-enhancing effect of deposit market competition.
منابع مشابه
MARTÍN BASURTO AND KANISKA DAM Competition and Bank Risk Taking in a Differntiated Oligopoly
We re-examine the relationship between the degree of deposit market competition and bank risk taking in a model where banks compete in differentiated deposit services. When banks invest their deposits directly, as has already been established in the extant literature, an increased degree of competition, measured either by greater degree of substitutability or by greater number of banks, induces...
متن کاملComments Welcome Harming Depositors and Helping Borrowers: The Disparate Impact of Bank Consolidation
There is growing evidence showing that large and small banks differ in how they service retail customers. Large, multi-market banks (LMBs) have more standardized operations and set interest rates that are uniform across local markets, while small banks have greater autonomy to set rates according to local market conditions. LMBs also differ from smaller banks by having relatively greater access...
متن کاملThe Effect Of Capital Buffer On The Relationship Between Liquidity Risk And Market and Book Risk Taking Of The Banks
This research examines the effect of the Capital Buffer, on banks as a regulatory and controlling factor on the relationship between liquidity risk and banks' risk aversion. In this study, eight banks were surveyed for the period of 2011-2014. In order to measure the Capital Buffer criterion, the legal deposit rates of central bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran has been used. For measuring...
متن کاملMarket Structure and Risk Taking in the Banking Industry∗
We demonstrate that the common view according to which an increase in competition leads banks to increased risk taking fails to hold in an environment where homogeneous loss averse consumers can choose in which bank to make a deposit based on their knowledge of the riskiness incorporated in the banks’ outstanding loan portfolios. With an exclusive focus on imperfect competition we find that ban...
متن کاملImplications of the Imperfect Deposit Market Structure for Micro and Macro Discretionary Prudential Policies
The aim of this study is to theoretically investigate the role of the bank deposit market structure in how effective micro and macro prudential policies in determining the regulatory capital of banks in combination with monetary policy. To achieve this, a partial equilibrium analytical framework has been developed that includes rational economic entities and the possibility of contagion risk in...
متن کامل